Thursday, January 29, 2009
Obediance is Human Nature
When the Meyer article was assigned, and I saw that the title was "If Hitler asked you..." I immediately knew what my response was: no. I thought to myself there is no way I would ever obey Hitler, because what he did was so horrible. Even as a read and annotated, I disagreed with the author's assertions that people would probably obey Hitler, because I didn't have an open mind to the concept Meyer was trying to prove. I believe thats how the majority of people now would react to that question. No chance would I obey Hitler, because that would be wrong. However, Stanley Milgrim's study proved otherwise. It proved that humans as a majority submit to authority, even if that is at the expense of the subject. If personal responsibility is non existant, which it was in the Milgrim case, then people will obey because its not their fault; they were just doing their job. And the same can be said about the people that obeyed Hitler. They were submitting to his ultimate authority because they could blame Hilter's orders and alleviate their own responsibility. People don't necessarily care about the subject if what happens is not directly their fault. I think this is a major flaw of human nature, because the people are not really thinking for themselves. The "teachers" knew they were hurting the "learners", but decided to ignore their own morals for the betterment of the study. I don't like how it works, but unfortunately I also believe it's human nature and is present in each of us.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)

I really like your point of view! As I was reading the article I also thought to myself that I would never obey, but now I really wonder what I would do. If the responsible wasn't on me, like you said, I think I would obey. You are right when you say this is a major flaw in human nature! =)
ReplyDeleteI think that what you're saying is very true, that the influence of authority has more impact on all of our lives than most people think. A major flaw I've realized from this reading is that humans tend to put blame too much on other people and don't take full responsibility for their actions. That's why people felt okay shocking the man because there was no responsibility on them. I definitely agree with your perspective.
ReplyDeleteThanks for your honesty in that post. I think it really takes a sociological imagination and some honesty to see that. I also forgot to mention in class that when considering history and biography one has to consider the idea of "Hitler". Like you said, anything with "Hitler" in it is tainted to us now, but in 1937, "Hitler" didn't have the same meaning as it does now.
ReplyDeleteMatt, I couldn't agree ore with what you said about responsibility and how if we are relieved of self-responsibility, we are capable of doing things that we never thought we would be able to do. To me, it seems that we are not raised or highly demanded of to take personal responsibility for actions. Usually, we look to put the blame for a mistake on someone else or say that it was completely out of our control-that we has no choice. However, what needs to be realized is that we always make a distinction between what is right and wrong, and that those actions that we deem to be good must be carried out so that we remain true to ourselves and don't lose our character and values. Great post Matt.
ReplyDelete